Valid point David, though it could be seen as making parkour more into a sport and also the fact that if we get a designated training park then we may not be able to train anywhere else due to officials saying "Well you have your place, why don't you use it!". But I can also see the other side in the fact that it will add an extra location to train, and a great place for people of all ages/skill levels/experience. When it comes to corrupting the spirit of parkour i can also see your point but again I believe that depends on the individual. If we teach and practice our training in the manner of to better our movement for the use of real parkour when it's needed then it shouldn't matter if we have a specific 'park' to train in. I think that just adds an extra item to the traceur arsenal. Since we should be able to train in ALL locations, both man-made & natural, whatever condition these locations are in, what the weather is like & what our body's are like at that current moment in time.
I will try to remain neutral on this one, since I'm happy whichever way this goes. I have managed perfectly with what we have for 7+ years, so having a brand spanking new location isn't essential to me. Yet it also adds something fresh which I can't deny I would fucking love.
If you think about it, up until
St Nicks is totally gone, it basically has been our parkour park. It is the location we have always met up at for
jams & it is also the best location for all skill levels & it is the location we have spent the most time training on. Even now we still occasionally find new things to do even after years of ruthless training on it. I don't think this will change even with the introduction of a parkour specific park.